<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacSpeech Announces Dictate Running on Dragon Naturally Speaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/2008/01/19/macspeech-announces-dictate-running-on-dragon-naturally-speaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/2008/01/19/macspeech-announces-dictate-running-on-dragon-naturally-speaking/</link>
	<description>The Light - Dragon Naturally Speaking and MindManager Coverage in Depth</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/2008/01/19/macspeech-announces-dictate-running-on-dragon-naturally-speaking/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/2008/01/19/macspeech-announces-dictate-running-on-dragon-naturally-speaking/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>That is very unfortunate.  I do not work with a Mac myself, but had mostly read from other reviews that Naturally Speaking worked much better in ISpeech than the former voice recognition engine.  I often find that it can be very difficult to get reliable reviews when it relates to Macs in general.  People tend to say the good about Macs and gloss over the bad things.

The fact that you have to 'train' it at all would be a tip off to me that it is not as good as the PC version, which can actually work very well out of the box with little to no training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is very unfortunate.  I do not work with a Mac myself, but had mostly read from other reviews that Naturally Speaking worked much better in ISpeech than the former voice recognition engine.  I often find that it can be very difficult to get reliable reviews when it relates to Macs in general.  People tend to say the good about Macs and gloss over the bad things.</p>
<p>The fact that you have to &#8216;train&#8217; it at all would be a tip off to me that it is not as good as the PC version, which can actually work very well out of the box with little to no training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sees</title>
		<link>http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/2008/01/19/macspeech-announces-dictate-running-on-dragon-naturally-speaking/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>sees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/2008/01/19/macspeech-announces-dictate-running-on-dragon-naturally-speaking/#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Mac NaturallySpeaking is a complete nightmare compared to the Microsoft version as a quad I have been using  naturally speaking for 15 years or so. I have been trying to train Mac for a week and it's still causes in very many errors. It does not create macros easily at all and if it does it usually does not remember them. I'm going to try and find some training somewhere since the people at Mac NaturallySpeaking do not seem to be very helpful. Sees was supposed to be my name key about that was not it either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac NaturallySpeaking is a complete nightmare compared to the Microsoft version as a quad I have been using  naturally speaking for 15 years or so. I have been trying to train Mac for a week and it&#8217;s still causes in very many errors. It does not create macros easily at all and if it does it usually does not remember them. I&#8217;m going to try and find some training somewhere since the people at Mac NaturallySpeaking do not seem to be very helpful. Sees was supposed to be my name key about that was not it either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
